Which is cheaper, Trigger.dev or Windmill?

Trigger.dev is 12.0x cheaper than Windmill. Trigger.dev starts at $0/mo, Windmill starts at $0/mo.

Does Trigger.dev have a free tier?

Yes, Trigger.dev offers a free tier with concurrentRuns: 20, teamMembers: 5, schedules: 10, logRetentionDays: 1, realtimeConnections: 10, usageCreditUsd: 5.

What is the switching cost between Trigger.dev and Windmill?

Trigger.dev has moderate switching cost. Windmill has moderate switching cost. Both have similar switching complexity.

← Back to Queues

Trigger.dev vs Windmill

Queues

Trigger.dev

← More affordable

Background job orchestration platform with built-in retry, scheduling, and realtime connections

Switching Cost: moderate

Windmill

Open-source workflow engine and developer platform for scripts, flows, and internal apps

Switching Cost: moderate

Analysis

The cost difference is substantial — Windmill runs about 12.0x what Trigger.dev charges.

You'll notice different pricing structures: flat-rate for Trigger.dev versus per-seat for Windmill.

Price-conscious teams should choose Trigger.dev — the cost advantage is hard to ignore, especially for growing workloads.

Bottom Line

Price-conscious teams should choose Trigger.dev — the cost advantage is hard to ignore, especially for growing workloads.

Price Difference

12.0x

Trigger.dev is cheaper by $110/mo

Pricing Model

Different

Tools charge using different pricing philosophies

Related Guides

Alternatives

Trigger.dev Alternatives

Alternatives

Windmill Alternatives

Best Free

Best Free Queues