Which is cheaper, Inngest or QStash?

Inngest is 2.4x cheaper than QStash. Inngest starts at $0/mo, QStash starts at $0/mo.

Does Inngest have a free tier?

Yes, Inngest offers a free tier with executionsPerMonth: 50000, concurrentSteps: 5, realtimeConnections: 50, users: 3.

Inngest has moderate switching cost. QStash has moderate switching cost. Both have similar switching complexity.

Queues

Inngest

← More affordable

Event-driven orchestration platform with step functions, flow control, and built-in retries for background jobs and workflows

Switching Cost: moderate

QStash

Serverless HTTP-based messaging and scheduling service from Upstash with at-least-once delivery

Switching Cost: moderate

Budget-wise, Inngest is clearly more affordable at roughly a 2.4x price difference.

You'll notice different pricing structures: hybrid for Inngest versus flat-rate for QStash.

If budget is your primary constraint, Inngest is the clear winner with its more wallet-friendly pricing structure.

If budget is your primary constraint, Inngest is the clear winner with its more wallet-friendly pricing structure.

Price Difference

2.4x

Inngest is cheaper by $105/mo

Pricing Model

Different

Tools charge using different pricing philosophies