Which is cheaper, Auth0 (B2C) or Zitadel?

Auth0 (B2C) is 2.9x cheaper than Zitadel. Auth0 (B2C) starts at $0/mo, Zitadel starts at $0/mo.

Does Auth0 (B2C) have a free tier?

Yes, Auth0 (B2C) offers a free tier with MAUs: 25000, organizations: 5, enterpriseConnections: 1, m2mTokens: 1000, tenants: 1, adminContributors: 3, logRetentionDays: 1, actionsAndForms: 5.

What is the switching cost between Auth0 (B2C) and Zitadel?

Auth0 (B2C) has significant switching cost. Zitadel has moderate switching cost. Zitadel is easier to switch away from.

← Back to Auth

Auth0 (B2C) vs Zitadel

Auth

Auth0 (B2C)

← More affordable

Flexible authentication and authorization platform for B2C applications, by Okta

Switching Cost: significant

Zitadel

Open-source identity management with DAU-based cloud pricing

Switching Cost: moderate

Analysis

Price sensitivity favors Auth0 (B2C), which costs about 2.9x less than Zitadel.

Their pricing models diverge: Auth0 (B2C) uses tiered, while Zitadel operates on a flat-rate basis.

If budget is your primary constraint, Auth0 (B2C) is the clear winner with its more wallet-friendly pricing structure.

Bottom Line

If budget is your primary constraint, Auth0 (B2C) is the clear winner with its more wallet-friendly pricing structure.

Price Difference

2.9x

Auth0 (B2C) is cheaper by $65/mo

Pricing Model

Different

Tools charge using different pricing philosophies

Switching Costs

Zitadel

Lower switching costs for easier migration

Related Guides

Alternatives

Auth0 (B2C) Alternatives